摘要
本文考察中国社会信用体系中自动化决策对行政正义原则的影响。通过对847件信用相关行政诉讼案件(2019-2025)的教义学分析和52份访谈(行政法官、数据科学家、受影响公民)，评估算法评分机制如何与正当程序要求、透明度义务和知情权互动。研究发现存在"合法性缺口"：地方政府使用的信用评分算法中73%缺乏公开的决策逻辑,仅12%的受影响个人成功通过行政复议质疑算法评估结果。本文提出适应中国行政法传统的"程序性算法问责"框架,包括强制性算法影响评估、实时解释接口和独立算法审计机制。
作者简介
-
Ling Chen
School of Law, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China
Ling Chen is a research fellow at School of Law, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China. Their research focuses on energy systems, with over 49 publications in peer-reviewed journals.
-
Rogier Creemers
Van Vollenhoven Institute, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
Rogier Creemers is a senior researcher at Van Vollenhoven Institute, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. Their research focuses on machine learning, with over 16 publications in peer-reviewed journals.
